<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Strategist.ie &#187; cash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.strategist.ie/tag/cash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.strategist.ie</link>
	<description>Professor Robert Galavan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2014 16:12:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.21</generator>
<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/4.0.5" -->
	<itunes:summary>Professor Robert Galavan</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>Professor Robert Galavan</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.strategist.ie/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Podcast-logo-strategist.jpg" />
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>Professor Robert Galavan</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>robert@robertgalavan.com</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<managingEditor>robert@robertgalavan.com (Professor Robert Galavan)</managingEditor>
	<copyright>&#xA9; 2013 Robert Galavan</copyright>
	<itunes:subtitle>Professor Robert Galavan</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:keywords>strategy, management, leadership, decision making, planning, cognition, marketing, analysis, executive, strategic management</itunes:keywords>
	
	<itunes:category text="Business">
		<itunes:category text="Management &amp; Marketing" />
	</itunes:category>
	<item>
		<title>What does the Apple dividend say about it&#8217;s strategy?</title>
		<link>http://www.strategist.ie/what-does-the-apple-dividend-say-about-its-strategy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.strategist.ie/what-does-the-apple-dividend-say-about-its-strategy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 21:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Galavan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dividend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oppenheimer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tim cooke]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategist.ie/?p=30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In January I <a href="http://facultyblog.nuimbusiness.ie/2012/01/29/apple-exceeds-14-million-dollars-in-sales-every-minute/" target="_blank">predicted</a> that we would see Apple deliver dividends in Q3 2012. I got it wrong, they are going for Q2 (that July 1 which is Apple&#8217;s fiscal Q4 2012) and <a href="http://investor.apple.com/dividends.cfm" target="_blank">this table</a> is going to look very different for the foreseeable future. So what does that mean for Apple&#8217;s future [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In January I <a href="http://facultyblog.nuimbusiness.ie/2012/01/29/apple-exceeds-14-million-dollars-in-sales-every-minute/" target="_blank">predicted</a> that we would see Apple deliver dividends in Q3 2012. I got it wrong, they are going for Q2 (that July 1 which is Apple&#8217;s fiscal Q4 2012) and <a href="http://investor.apple.com/dividends.cfm" target="_blank">this table</a> is going to look very different for the foreseeable future. So what does that mean for Apple&#8217;s future strategy?<img src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7146/6774634275_73b52d6267_n.jpg" alt="" align="right" border="0" /></p>
<p>Apple last paid a dividend back in 1995 and a change to a 17 year old policy is bound to get a lot of attention. It is certainly a significant move but, I don&#8217;t believe it is actually of much strategic importance. At the same time Apple announced that they would be engaging in a multi-annual share buy back programme. This too is significant but, not necessarily strategic. So how can a major share buy back and a dividend policy of the scale ($45 Billion) announced by Apple not have strategic implications?</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s look at some of the numbers. The dividend announced is $2.65 quarterly ($10.60 annualised) per share. With <a href="http://caps.fool.com/Ticker/AAPL.aspx" target="_blank">Apple stock</a> hitting the €600 mark that represents a dividend yield of 1.76%. At over 930 million outstanding shares that adds up to an annual $10 Billion dividend payment making it one of the largest absolute dividend payouts on the US stockmarket.</p>
<p>The share buy back scheme is committed collecting $10 Billion over the next three years. There is not enough detail provided to work out the exact number here, but in the <a href="http://events.apple.com.edgesuite.net/123pijhbsdfvohbafv19/event/index.html" target="_blank">conference call </a>Oppenheimer, Apple&#8217;s CFO, mentioned an expected $4 Billion cash draw in the first 12 months which is the net impact of share buy back and the cash cost of dividend payments to net settle stock options being vested. Interestingly, Apple&#8217;s CEO, Tim Cooke, has waived his right to dividend payments on his unvested stock options. As you would expect it is difficult enough to unpick these numbers, but given that the first year cash draw is estimated to be $4 Billion ($12 Billion if it remained stable over the three years) and the estimates are for a total $45 Billion cash draw, which leaves $15 Billion after dividends, we can presume that some of the $3 Billion buffer is for expected stock price rises.</p>
<p> <span id="more-30"></span></p>
<p><img src="http://node_charts_production.s3.amazonaws.com/85cf9d18a231d68709616d6c34151989.png" alt="Apple Free Cash Flow TTM Chart" align="left" border="0" />So overall Apple will be down by $45 Billion dollars in cash over the next three years, right! Well sort of. Relatively this is correct, but in absolute terms that doesn&#8217;t explain the whole story. In the past year Apple generated $41 Billion in free cash and if it continues at that rate it will actually swell its bank balance $27 Billion dollars in the coming year even after the share buy back and dividend payments. To thread water and maintain its cash balance it needs to keep generating free cash at the rate it did in mid 2010. All this is of course assuming there are no monster acquisitions.</p>
<p>So if, as it seems likely, Apple will have north of $100 Billion cash this time next year, what could they buy. Well Google might be a little out of their reach for an outright purchase with a market capitalisation of $210 Billion, but Philips or Sony could be a snip at $20 Billion a piece!</p>
<p>So what does all this mean for Apple&#8217;s strategy. In short, very little. The decision to pay such huge dividends is a function of a company that can grow revenues with excellent margins that translate rapidly into cash. This is a company that grows organically and while it needs cash for that growth and some flexibility to make acquisitions it has more than enough cash to cope.</p>
<p>The bigger Apple question is what does the pipeline look like. From Tim Cooke you get the standard answer – trust me it&#8217;s great. It is however pretty clear that the iPad and iPhone markets are moving (slowly) towards commoditisation. Unit prices are not growing and over the next 24 months Apple will be forced to bring out infill products to cover the range as they already have with the iPod in the form of Shuffle, Nano, Classic and Touch. This helps maintain revenue but hurts margin –  and  Apple&#8217;s share price demands margin. For the moment we will have to wait and see what emerges. Maintaining significant growth from the current baseline needs something like a new $1 Billion business every week! That will mean they need to own and probably create some new market spaces. Will it be new markets, new products, new sectors, new services, or integrated offerings. Yes. It will take all of the above to feed the Apple monster. This is going to be fun to watch.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a class="twitter-follow-button" href="https://twitter.com/robertgalavan" data-size="large" data-show-count="false">Follow @robertgalavan</a><br />
<script type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[
!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document,"script","twitter-wjs");
// ]]&gt;</script>
</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>by Robert Galavan, PhD</p>
<p>Professor of Strategic Management at the National University of Ireland Maynooth</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>This post was originally published here <a href="http://facultyblog.nuimbusiness.ie/2012/03/23/what-does-the-apple-dividend-say-about-its-strategy">http://facultyblog.nuimbusiness.ie/2012/03/23/what-does-the-apple-dividend-say-about-its-strategy</a></p>
<div class="bjtags">Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/apple" rel="tag">apple</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/strategy" rel="tag">strategy</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/marketing" rel="tag">marketing</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/innovation" rel="tag">innovation</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/ipad" rel="tag">ipad</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/ipod" rel="tag">ipod</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/tim+cooke" rel="tag">tim+cooke</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/oppenheimer" rel="tag">oppenheimer</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/dividend" rel="tag">dividend</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/share+repurchase" rel="tag">share+repurchase</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.strategist.ie/what-does-the-apple-dividend-say-about-its-strategy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple exceeds 1/4 million dollars in sales every minute</title>
		<link>http://www.strategist.ie/apple-exceeds-14-million-dollars-in-sales-every-minute/</link>
		<comments>http://www.strategist.ie/apple-exceeds-14-million-dollars-in-sales-every-minute/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 20:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Galavan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dividend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oppenheimer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tim cooke]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategist.ie/?p=24</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p> <p>It appears money does grow on trees, but only a particular brand of Apple tree. Apple Inc released their <a href="http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2012/01/24Apple-Reports-First-Quarter-Results.html" target="_blank">Q1 2012 results </a>during the week and they have exceeded all expectations. The results are ahead of revenue <a href="http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2012/01/22/can-apple-still-deliver-an-earnings-surprise/" target="_blank">predictions</a> from independent analysts by over 7% and a staggering 18% ahead of institutional investors. So [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.gsmdome.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/apple_profit_graph_071022_ms.jpg" alt="" border="0" hspace="25" vspace="25" /></p>
<p>It appears money does grow on trees, but only a particular brand of Apple tree. Apple Inc released their <a href="http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2012/01/24Apple-Reports-First-Quarter-Results.html" target="_blank">Q1 2012 results </a>during the week and they have exceeded all expectations. The results are ahead of revenue <a href="http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2012/01/22/can-apple-still-deliver-an-earnings-surprise/" target="_blank">predictions</a> from independent analysts by over 7% and a staggering 18% ahead of institutional investors. So just how big is the number –  $46.33bn for the quarter.<span id="more-24"></span></p>
<p>Since the meltdown of the Irish banking system we have become a little too accustomed to letting billions role off our tongue and the eye watering enormity of the results might benefit from some context setting. On an annualised basis (and converted at about $1.30 = €1.00) that turnover is €143bn per annum. That is</p>
<ul>
<li>more than Ireland&#8217;s GNP</li>
<li>€272,000 in sales every minute</li>
<li>40 times Ryanair&#8217;s turnover</li>
<li>in €500 notes placed end to end it would reach to the moon –  120 times</li>
</ul>
<p><img src="http://www.coated.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/why-babies-cry.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></p>
<p>In reaching that figure Apple sold <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5879083/apple-sells-more-phones-in-a-day-than-people-make-babies" target="_blank">more iPhones</a> every day that there are babies born in the world with a total annualised figure now in excess of 1/2 billion iOS devices sold per year.</p>
<p>It wasn&#8217;t a case of turnover for vanity either, there was plenty of profit for sanity to go with it. At $13bn net income for the quarter Apples <em>profit</em> is larger than <a href="http://investor.google.com/earnings/2011/Q3_google_earnings.html" target="_blank">Googles</a> <em>turnover</em> which is running at around $10bn per quarter.</p>
<p>All this success does bring a few headaches though, notably what to do with the almost $100bn in cash and equities (loosely called cash on hand –  in other words cash not doing anything productive in Apple). Apple hasn&#8217;t paid out a dividend since 1995, which is, in some part, due to the conservative nature of the late Steve Jobs. Tim Cook the new CEO has however said that he is <a href="http://gigaom.com/apple/apple-actively-discussing-what-to-do-with-98b-cash-pile/" target="_blank">“not religious” about holding on to the cash</a>.</p>
<p><img src="http://jumponthisnow.webs.com/cash-pile.png" alt="" align="left" border="0" hspace="25" vspace="25" /></p>
<p>At about 46% Return on Equity the shareholders would probably prefer that Apple found things to do with the cash. Certainly Apple will need cash to invest in new product capability, but that will only put a small dent in the pile if they keep generating stellar profits. Acquisitions are the other productive use, but Apple&#8217;s acquisitions have traditionally been small. These small acquisitions are relatively low risk (even if high impact as in the case of Siri) and so relatively easy to manage and embed in the Apple culture. Apple could and should be looking at mobile and related technologies, but any large acquisition (and with a $100bn on hand large is really large) will be difficult to merge and could risk diverting valuable attention from the current business model which it has to be said is working quite well. My view is that we will see Apple break its decade long tight fisted grip on cash and will discuss modest dividends in Q3.</p>
<p>In Market Capitalization Apple is now head to head with Exxon for the title of the worlds most valuable company, both are running at around $420bn. However, that is where the similarities end. Apple&#8217;s balance sheet shows about $140bn in assets, only a fraction of Exxon&#8217;s $320bn. Put crudely, if Apple buys an office desk for $200 the market will pay about $600 for it in shares. In Exxon&#8217;s case the same desk is only &#8216;worth&#8217; about $260 to investors. This 30% premium on Exxon&#8217;s tangible assets is a reflection of the investors belief in the value of its intangible assets and the future profit growth potential of the business. In Apple&#8217;s case this intangible component is a staggering 200% premium. A full 2/3<sup>rd</sup> of Apples market value is in the eye of the beholder –  now that&#8217;s real love!</p>
<p>[This was originally posted at <a href="http://facultyblog.nuimbusiness.ie/2012/01/29/apple-exceeds-14-million-dollars-in-sales-every-minute/">http://facultyblog.nuimbusiness.ie/2012/01/29/apple-exceeds-14-million-dollars-in-sales-every-minute/]</a></p>
<p><a class="twitter-follow-button" href="https://twitter.com/robertgalavan" data-size="large" data-show-count="false">Follow @robertgalavan</a><br />
<script type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[
!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs="d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document,"script","twitter-wjs");"
// ]]&gt;</script>
</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>by Robert Galavan, PhD</p>
<p>Professor of Strategic Management at the National University of Ireland Maynooth</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.strategist.ie/apple-exceeds-14-million-dollars-in-sales-every-minute/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
